Latest News from Outsiders Inn

Judge: Clark County liable for clearing out homeless camps

County must pay for belongings lost in clearing encampments


TACOMA — A federal judge in Tacoma has found Clark County liable for seizing the residents’ belongings when it cleared out homeless encampments.

In a ruling Friday, Judge Robert Bryan said the county’s inmate work crews violated the constitutional rights of at least a half-dozen homeless residents by throwing out their tents, stoves, medication, documents and photographs during sweeps from 2012 to 2014. A trial is set for Oct. 3 to determine how much the county must pay in damages, but settlement talks are also planned.

“The only evidence in the record is that the county’s employees took all unattended property and then immediately destroyed the property, regardless of whether the property was abandoned,” the judge wrote.

He declined to immediately rule on the merits of claims by two other campers, saying it wasn’t clear who took their property.

One hour’s notice

In March 2012, the Clark County Department of Corrections adopted a policy that work crews should clean up camps immediately if they’d been abandoned. If they hadn’t been abandoned, it said, the workers were to give one hour’s notice that the residents had to vacate the area and take their belongings with them.

In practice, the crews often didn’t determine whether the property had been abandoned. One crew supervisor testified in a deposition that if his workers complained that a campsite appeared to be recently occupied, he ordered them to clean up, anyway.

A lawyer for the county did not immediately return an email seeking comment Friday.

Some campers left to eat meals at a local shelter, then returned to find the work crews seizing their property and refusing to give it back. Among the items taken were dentures, a photograph of a deceased child, and legal documents such as Social Security cards and disability insurance papers.

A homeless resident, Terry Ellis, left a backpack at a bus stop while he offered to help a woman whose car had broken down nearby. Even though Ellis was within sight when the work crew arrived, the crew took it, ignoring his explanation for why he left it there, Ellis said in court filings.

Inside the backpack were new clothes he had been given so he could apply for a job, he said.

Another plaintiff and formerly homeless man, Adam Kravitz, had briefly left his bags by the Columbia River in 2012 and returned to find work crews taking them away. Kravitz and the group he was with asked the men to leave, but they were threatened with arrest, court documents show. Kravitz did not protest any further from there, he said.

Kravitz recently launched a nonprofit called Outsiders Inn to advocate for Clark County’s homeless community, and said it was incidents like these that spurred him to action. Friday’s ruling was “a big win,” he said.

“I’m very glad that they acknowledged that they were in the wrong,” he said. “I really hope, moving forward, that the policies can be strengthened and adhered to even better.”

Read more ...

Unhoused Residents Association advocates on its own behalf

Group, which meets once a month, gives homeless a voice

AdamKravitz NatalieBehring TheColumbian

By Patty Hastings, Columbian Social Services, Demographics, Faith


There are neighborhood associations for most every area in Clark County, but what about people without an address?

The new Unhoused Residents Association looks to empower homeless people in Clark County by making them an officially recognized group that can advocate on its own behalf. In February, the association began holding monthly town hall meetings at St. Luke’s Episcopal Church in west Vancouver.

Outsiders Inn, a homeless advocacy group, formed the association; meetings are facilitated by founder Adam Kravitz. He said he is a more effective advocate when he hears the most relevant, current concerns from people who are living on the streets.

“That’s why we do this. Everybody gets a voice, and everybody gets to be heard,” he said. “The magic of these meetings is bringing people together and the collaboration that’s going to happen.”

Kravitz is a new board member at Share, which operates shelters in Clark County, so he is able to offer institutional knowledge and relay what’s happening at the nonprofit organization to the Unhoused Residents Association members. Ren Autrey, also of Outsiders Inn, keeps minutes during the meetings.

Fliers for the association read: “No decisions about us, without us!”

Judi Bailey, neighborhoods program manager at the city of Vancouver, said neighborhood associations are geographically defined and are officially recognized by city ordinance. That means that those without an address cannot form a neighborhood association. The Unhoused Residents Association would be considered a sort of stakeholder group, she said, similar to Bike Clark County or the Clark County Rental Association.

“It’s more a group that’s connected by interest than geographical location,” Bailey said.

K.C. Vee, who lives out of his van with his wife, attended the group’s second meeting on March 10. The 40-year-old said he isn’t sure if politicians will listen to him about his concerns but they would be more apt to listen to a reputable organization, whether it’s Outsiders Inn or the Unhoused Residents Association. He is concerned about the negative perception of the homeless, he added.

“This isn’t just a bunch of people sitting around whining about being homeless,” Vee said. “We want to change our circumstance.”

Danny Hessick said he heard about the meetings at Friends of the Carpenter and a volunteer with the nonprofit group drove him to the meeting at St. Luke’s. The 47-year-old said he likes that the gatherings give him a chance to let other people know what he is feeling.

Also in attendance were representatives from agencies that assist the homeless, including 211Info, the Arnada Abbey, Hands of Favor and His Presents.

Seeking solutions

Many topics were covered at the two-hour meeting on March 10.

Read more ...

A response to a blog

On Feb 26, The Columbian posted the blog, ‘The urinating on chairs was bad enough’.  It focused on the Clark County council's revisiting of a plan to make the Public Service Center at 1300 Franklin Street a limited-use facility.  They understand the reason they are doing this is to restrict the homeless in the area from using the needed water and bathroom facilities because they waited until there was an official day center in the city to revisit this plan.  But the problem with that is, the day center is a LONG WALK (20 minutes or more) if you have to use the bathroom while you are in the area of the service center and even feels longer when you "have to go", and when you are walking in the rain with a backpack heavy with your worldly possessions.

This article said the facility has had issues with "some individuals", but yet they are looking to restrict everyone instead of just addressing the problem individuals. They say it is to "give teeth to dealing with troublemakers", however that can most likely be read as "people they deem as potential troublemakers". Now we ask, "how will that clarification be made between a real troublemaker and someone just needing to use the facilities appropriately?" Sadly, more than likely it will be made by "how you are dressed" and "if they look homeless". The facility personnel complains and worries about urine smell on the furniture. Every public place has this problem over time. They are obviously using that statement as an "ick factor" to bring about sympathy from people they are hoping to slide this rule change by. We ask, are they assuming that the smell on furniture comes only from a homeless person, or will they apply that assumption of smell to every 40+ year old woman or man with a bladder control problem? Will they ask / inspect older people if they are wearing their Depends properly? Will they ask disabled persons if they have spina bifida or other physical ailments to not use the chairs? Will they ask parents with children in diapers to not sit on furniture and only stand in the wait area, or not enter all together since their diapers might leak on a chair? -- If they are complaining about furniture being used and smelling, then all those kinds of people an situations need to also be taken into consideration, or this is a unfair burden being put on our county's Unhoused Residents.

In my opinion, I doubt this rule change is anything but one more way to separate the Unhoused from the Housed and to keep the Unhoused Residents of our community from using public facilities such as clean water fountains and bathrooms.   "We maintain a public water fountain outside the building", they might say about the water... but do you see the picture we have included here?  THIS is the condition of the water fountain outside of the building.  It is unacceptable. Clean water and bathrooms are HUMAN RIGHTS.  Clark County and the Public Service building staff needs to be sure they are attending to the needs of EVERYONE, the Unhoused as well as the Housed residents, using this PUBLIC FACILITY.